Our approach was bifurcated into three phases:
Phase I - Understanding the Business and Industry Dynamics (Research)
We held discussions with the management of the
Indian Operations, the Client, and the Adviser while
analyzing the business model of the Indian
Operations. This gave us valuable insights on future
business plans of the Indian Operations and their
service offerings.
We referred to proprietary databases and research
reports for an in-depth understanding on the Indian
logistics sector. We then adopted a top-down
approach in order to understand the future outlook
of the logistics industry.
Phase II - Evaluation of Methodologies
We started by evaluating the various valuation
approaches, namely the Asset Approach, Income
Approach, and Market Approach. Since the Client
prepared a global logistics business plan based on
geography, company specific business plans were not
available. As a reasonable bifurcation between the
global company’s and Indian Operation’s business
plan for each of the Indian Companies was not
possible, the discounted cash flow method was ruled
out.
There were recent transactions involving the Indian
Operations company as well as that of a comparable
listed peer’s in India. Taking the specific facts
regarding the Indian Operations into account, we
identified PORT and CCM under Market Approach
to value the Indian Companies.
Phase III- Valuation Conclusion
With the CCM valuation using the EV to EBIT multiple
and PORT valuation, we presented our findings to the
Client and Adviser in the form of a valuation report
detailing our valuation approach, process and
valuation conclusion.
To produce a sound conclusion, we used both the
CCM and PORT methods to value the closely-held
Indian Operations of the Client. Since there was a
recent, orderly transaction which took place within a
span of one year from the Valuation Date, it
represents the fair value of the Indian Operations.